<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:47:42 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><feed xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="0.3"><title>Mascara JavaScript Compiler - Comments</title><id>squarespace:weblog:4492089</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/"/><modified>2012-01-08T08:57:40Z</modified><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><info type="application/xhtml+xml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">News</div></info><entry><title>adidas soccer cleats comments on What is an execution backend?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2009/7/28/what-is-an-execution-backend.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-4855344-16057091</id><author><name>adidas soccer cleats</name></author><created>2011-12-01T16:18:11Z</created><issued>2011-12-01T16:18:11Z</issued><modified>2011-12-01T16:18:11Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>When Carvalho back, almost can return to  the athletic field, but unfortunately again encountered injuries. Real Madrid &#39;s official  website on 30 day notice: Carvalho wear <a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Adidas-F50-t1-38.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>adidas f50  adizero prime</strong> </a> <strong> </strong>soccer cleats in the training of  right knee medial ligament strain. Despite the truce, but&quot; Marca&quot; on  Carvalho&#39;s prospects some pessimistic,&quot; unfortunately, Carvalho&#39;s wear <strong><a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Adidas-Adipure-t1-39.html" rel="nofollow">adidas adipure iv sl</a> </strong>soccer cleats sprained ankle. He could have advanced into the  Mourinho plan, but this was injured lets him out.&quot; Recent results from  Real Madrid, Carvalho misses and does not have too big impact, Ramos from the  right to the centre-back position performed extremely well, can be completely  replaced Carvalho wear <strong><a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Adidas-Adipower-t1-40.html" rel="nofollow">adidas adipower predator</a> </strong>soccer cleats as the ball core.</p><p>Cristiano Ronaldo wear <a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Nike-CTR360-t1-36.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>nike ctr360 maestri ii elite</strong> </a> <strong> </strong>soccer cleats also did not participate in the 30 training. The  Portuguese were in Madrid Derby injured, that game, Cristiano Ronaldo <strong><a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/" rel="nofollow">total 90 laser</a> </strong>left  in the first speed sprint through competing side horse, the latter from behind  the Cristiano Ronaldo wear <a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Nike-T90-t1-35.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>nike total 90  laser iv</strong> </a> <strong> </strong>soccer cleats tackles down, but Cristiano Ronaldo managed to play a  full game ankle pain. After the match reports in the Spanish media, Cristiano  Ronaldo wear <a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Nike-Mercurial-t1-34.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>nike mercurial</strong><strong> vapor superfly  iii</strong> </a> <strong> </strong>soccer cleats is limped off. Real  Madrid official told Cristiano Ronaldo&quot; left ankle sprain one level&quot;,  according to the common sense to judge,<strong> <a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/" rel="nofollow">ctr360  maestri ii</a></strong> the Portuguese superstar was  expected in the 7-10 day rehabilitation, the fastest to be able to catch up  with the League against Sporting Gijon, 30 is the Cristiano Ronaldo wear <a href="http://www.soccercleatsoutlets.com/Nike-Tiempo-t1-37.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>nike tiempo legend iv elite</strong> </a> <strong> </strong>soccer cleats ankle injury for fourth days, so they can continue to  accept drug and physical therapy.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>René comments on F3 - Open Definition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2011/1/22/f3-open-definition.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-10175472-12438258</id><author><name>René</name></author><created>2011-03-28T08:58:55Z</created><issued>2011-03-28T08:58:55Z</issued><modified>2011-03-28T08:58:55Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>I meant not an extension for Visual Studio, but for own editors build in VS, i.e. with C# or so. Anyway - I think the Eclipse extension is also good, esp. as it may be extended with self-written plugins, which leads also to a customized editor product, too.  :)</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Olav comments on "If a feature is not documented, it does not exist"</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2010/2/6/if-a-feature-is-not-documented-it-does-not-exist.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-6582957-12307489</id><author><name>Olav</name></author><created>2011-03-25T18:28:27Z</created><issued>2011-03-25T18:28:27Z</issued><modified>2011-03-25T18:28:27Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>@AJG: Yes, packages are supported. You have to declare the members inside a <code>package</code> block:<br/><code><br/>package foo {<br/>&nbsp;    class Bar {<br/>&nbsp; &nbsp;        ...<br/>&nbsp;    }<br/>}<br/>var bar = new foo::Bar;<br/>// or:<br/>import foo;<br/>var bar = new Bar;<br/></code><br/>See more: http://www.mascaraengine.com/doc/package</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Olav comments on F3 - Open Definition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2011/1/22/f3-open-definition.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-10175472-12307410</id><author><name>Olav</name></author><created>2011-03-25T18:20:45Z</created><issued>2011-03-25T18:20:45Z</issued><modified>2011-03-25T18:20:45Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>@René: Much of the editor-integration code is in Python and editor-agnostic, only the UI part is specific for Eclipse. If there is interest in a Visual Studio-extension for Mascara, I could look into creating it. Right now, most of the interest seem to be around Eclipse.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>René comments on F3 - Open Definition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2011/1/22/f3-open-definition.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-10175472-12288981</id><author><name>René</name></author><created>2011-03-25T12:49:36Z</created><issued>2011-03-25T12:49:36Z</issued><modified>2011-03-25T12:49:36Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>Will these great features like context related location of definitions or code completion be published in the Mascara python compiler scripts? It would be great if they would be somehow useable for integration into other code editors (i.e. own Visual Studio Projects) too.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Olav comments on Another improvement related to 'var'.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2010/11/27/another-improvement-related-to-var.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-9579268-10653498</id><author><name>Olav</name></author><created>2010-11-28T12:14:21Z</created><issued>2010-11-28T12:14:21Z</issued><modified>2010-11-28T12:14:21Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>@Peter: No, the compiler does not create any additional anonymous functions. It is simply a compile-time warning which will prevent some bugs.</p><p>&#39;Let&#39;-scopes could be implemented as you suggest basically by creating an anonymous function for the block. But it is somewhat more tricky than just creating an anonymous function, since &#39;return&#39;, &#39;break&#39; and &#39;continue&#39; could occur inside the let-scope.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Olav comments on Another improvement related to 'var'.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2010/11/27/another-improvement-related-to-var.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-9579268-10653491</id><author><name>Olav</name></author><created>2010-11-28T12:05:49Z</created><issued>2010-11-28T12:05:49Z</issued><modified>2010-11-28T12:05:49Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>@Eli: No, it is valid ECMAScript 5 code, even in strict mode. But the Mascara compiler will give a warning.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Peter van der Zee comments on Another improvement related to 'var'.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2010/11/27/another-improvement-related-to-var.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-9579268-10653448</id><author><name>Peter van der Zee</name></author><created>2010-11-28T11:29:06Z</created><issued>2010-11-28T11:29:06Z</issued><modified>2010-11-28T11:29:06Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>Basically you&#39;ve changed `var` to be `let`, at the cost of (probably?) an additional anonymous function for any block scope (including the additional cost of calling the function and having an extra context in your scope chain) and screwing up the most basic knowledge for any decent js developer. Sounds like a good job.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Eli Grey comments on Another improvement related to 'var'.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2010/11/27/another-improvement-related-to-var.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-9579268-10651254</id><author><name>Eli Grey</name></author><created>2010-11-27T20:01:34Z</created><issued>2010-11-27T20:01:34Z</issued><modified>2010-11-27T20:01:34Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that your last example is illegal ECMAScript code (or illegal in strict mode)? I&#39;ve done <code>if (!something) {var something = ...;}</code> quite a few times and I thought that was perfectly legal.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>AJG comments on "If a feature is not documented, it does not exist"</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.mascaraengine.com/news/2010/2/6/if-a-feature-is-not-documented-it-does-not-exist.html#comments"/><id>squarespace:comment:4492089-6582957-7389019</id><author><name>AJG</name></author><created>2010-02-10T01:19:05Z</created><issued>2010-02-10T01:19:05Z</issued><modified>2010-02-10T01:19:05Z</modified><content type="text/html" xml:lang="en-US" mode="escaped"><![CDATA[<p>Are packages implemented? The link redirects to the main documentation page, which leads me to think they aren't. Will they be, soon? I think they are greatly needed in order to write modular code. Is there currently any way to do something like:</p><p><code></p><p>class Foo::Bar {<br/>   ...<br/>}</p><p>var bar = new Foo::Bar;</p><p></code></p><p>In other words, is there any way to place classes within namespaces or packages?</p><p>Thanks!</p>]]></content></entry></feed>
